\u00a0<\/p>\n
At the 2025 Venice Architecture Biennale<\/strong><\/a>, Morocco\u2019s national pavilion<\/strong><\/a> addresses challenges posed by earthquakes across the region by taking an elemental approach to material, memory, and seismic resilience. Titled Materiae Palimpsest, the exhibition takes form as an evocative landscape bridging construction research prototypes with an artistic scenography. We see a cluster of\u00a0 columns built from natural local materials such as rammed earth, stone, and timber sourced from across Morocco, configured as a series of passageways almost evocative of archaeological ruins \u2013 perhaps the aftermath of an earthquake. They all encircle a hologram representing the human condition and ancestral knowledge \u2014 \u2018It\u2019s intentionally fragile and immaterial, confronting the physical nature of the materials around it,\u2019 <\/em>Khalil Morad El Ghilali tells designboom.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n The architect, who co-curated the exhibition with El Mehdi Belyasmine, explains how these structures function as sectional scale models manifesting the duo\u2019s ongoing research into how local construction know-how can be revitalized to shape earthquake-proof architecture. \u2018We\u2019ve been gathering around 136 completely different techniques and materialities from all around the country \u2014 from the north to the south \u2014 that we\u2019ve here integrated into 72 columns. These columns serve as a kind of guide for construction, particularly for architects interested in sustainable development,\u2019 <\/em>he explains.<\/strong><\/p>\n all images courtesy of Morocco Pavilion<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Materiae Palimpsest resonates in light of Morocco\u2019s devastating 2023 earthquake. In rebuilding affected rural settlements, Khalil Morad El Ghilali and El Mehdi Belyasmine\u2019s respective practices, and others like them, have demonstrated that heritage-based techniques can perform better than concrete. The architects point out that some of their team\u2019s pilot structures near the epicentre remained undamaged, owing to a combination of local craftsmanship and adapted engineering, rooted in generational know-how. This extends the curators\u2019 approach that is driven by the urgency to reframe ancestral methods as scalable, adaptive, and technically sound alternatives to industrial construction. \u2018There are areas without internet, robotics, or digital tools,\u2019 <\/em>El Ghilali <\/a>shares with designboom during our visit to the pavilion.<\/strong> \u2018So instead of abstract concepts, we aim to improve local crafts through practical upgrades in engineering and architecture, without losing sight of what people can really do at a large scale.\u2019<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n This philosophy grounds the pavilion in a clear critique of contemporary architectural education and practice, which, they note, often privileges conceptual gestures over material literacy. Calls for a broader reflection on how architectural knowledge is produced, El Ghalili adds: \u2018Too often today, architects don\u2019t know how to build with their hands. They\u2019re trained to be conceptual rather than constructive.\u2019 He frames revisiting these embodied modes of making is as a return to a collaborative, ground-up process that brings designers back into conversation with materials, with place, and with the people who build, as emphasized by the flickering hologram figure at the center of the space, and the traces of the human hand it confronts as carried in each of the columns. Read our full interview with the architect below.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n designboom (DB): <\/strong>Can you <\/strong>introduce the idea<\/strong> behind the creation of the pavilion?<\/strong><\/p>\n Khalil Morad El Ghilali (KMEG): <\/strong>The idea was to sublimate the materiality and showcase the diversity of local construction techniques across Morocco. We\u2019ve been gathering around 136 completely different techniques and materialities from all around the country \u2014 from the north to the south \u2014 that we\u2019ve here integrated into 72 columns. These columns serve as a kind of guide for construction, particularly for architects interested in sustainable development.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n This pavilion is one of our latest experiments: we used post-tensioned, prefabricated blocks as a potential solution for rebuilding in earthquake-affected areas. The entire pavilion was also assembled in three days. The blocks are solid, not hollow, and actually the heaviest one weighs 500 kilograms, and yet they were mounted like Lego pieces.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n DB: There are many layers to the scenography, from the this almost ruins-like landscape of columns, to the textiles and the screen at the center. Can you share more about that?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n KMEG: <\/strong>We\u2019ve divided the scenography into three main elements.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n The first is the columns, which reflect building, engineering, and architecture. The second is the tools. These are represented by the muqarnas hanging from the ceiling, which were historically used to construct such elements. We sourced them from different villages, and each tool carries the trace of a human hand and an imprint of collective engineering. The third element is the human condition, represented by a hologram. It\u2019s intentionally fragile and immaterial, confronting the physical nature of the materials around it.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n DB: The presence of the hologram was quite unexpected after walking through all these tactile details. What role does it play within the overall composition?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n KMEG: <\/strong>It raises a question about whether we should keep chasing extraordinary technologies to solve our problems, or whether we should instead ask what we can learn from our ancestors \u2014 not archaeologically, but humbly. There\u2019s a vast body of knowledge gathered over thousands of years, and this project is about reconnecting with that wisdom rather than erasing it and starting from scratch.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n So for us, this pavilion becomes a place of knowledge, collective intelligence, smell, fabric, texture, memory. Like a foyer, a place to gather. It reflects how Moroccans welcome people, how spaces are warm and inviting. Each brick, each tool, each trace carries human intelligence. Confronting these elements \u2014 between the artificial and the natural \u2014 was very important to us and the main idea of the pavilion.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n DB: Does the hologram, as a symbol for the \u2018human condition\u2019, serve as more of a symbolic counterpoint to the raw materials surrounding it, or tie them together?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n KMEG:<\/strong>\u00a0For us, it\u2019s a confrontation. The hologram is encased in glass and placed at the center of the room, and above it, we placed some of the heaviest formwork elements, really emphasizing its fragility. But then it\u2019s also symbolically loaded; it\u2019s a memory of what might remain of the human condition in the future if we lose our connection to materiality and making. Maybe that\u2019s all we\u2019ll have left, a memory.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n The idea is to really highlight the tension between the immaterial and the physical \u2014 between where we are headed and what we still have.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n DB:<\/strong> Building on that, what kind of questions do you hope visitors will walk away with? Is the goal to present solutions, or to create space for reflection, or both?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n KMEG:<\/strong> We\u2019re not trying to offer definitive answers, but rather pose questions. Let people find their own meanings through the combinations of materials we present, like earth from Marrakech, stones from the coastal areas and rivers, earth from central Morocco. These materials allow for different engineering possibilities, including seismic resistance, construction, elevations.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n It\u2019s really an individual experience, but also a collective one at the same time. The pavilion\u2019s passages ensure that only one person can stand inside a column at a time. We wanted each visitor to directly face the materiality of that individual column, despite the openness of the layout.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n DB:<\/strong> You\u2019ve emphasized that your reference to traditional techniques isn\u2019t nostalgic or archaeological. Can you elaborate on how these indigenous methods can be applied today, especially in the face of environmental challenges?<\/strong><\/p>\n \nKMEG:<\/strong> The main contemporary application is earthquake resistance. You probably heard about the earthquake in Morocco two years ago. It affected regions where villages were traditionally built using earth and stone. Unfortunately, many of those techniques have been lost, and what replaced them, like poor-quality concrete, wasn\u2019t adapted to the climate or structural needs.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Since then, one of the main questions has been to consider how we can rebuild those villages. And so we\u2019ve been working with local techniques and engineering knowledge. Some of our projects, built near the earthquake zone using these methods, had no damage, and I\u2019ve also been publishing research around this. The idea is to provide technologies that are accessible and replicable, technologies that people can actually assess and use, rather than ones completely out of reach due to the pace of innovation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n There are areas without internet, robotics, or digital tools. So instead of abstract concepts, we aim to improve local crafts through practical upgrades in engineering and architecture, without losing sight of what people can really do at a large scale. We worked directly with local craftspeople for this, and we built with our hands, with media,<\/p>\n In many ways, this is also a critique of the architectural profession.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Too often today, architects don\u2019t know how to build with their hands. They\u2019re trained to be conceptual rather than constructive. We need to bring back the role of the master builder. This pavilion was built by hand, together with craftspeople and media specialists. We wanted to show that design must happen through communication, with those who actually know how to make.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n project info:<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n name:<\/strong> Materiae Palimpsest \u2014 Morocco Pavilion<\/p>\n curators:<\/strong> Khalil Morad El Ghilali<\/a>, El Mehdi Belyasmine<\/a><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n program:<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong>Venice Architecture Biennale<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0@labiennale<\/a><\/p>\n dates:<\/strong>\u00a0May 10th \u2014 November 23rd, 2025<\/p>\n The post interview: morocco pavilion\u2019s earth-based, seismic architecture of future at venice biennale<\/a> appeared first on designboom | architecture & design magazine<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Materiae Palimpsest: Morocco pavilion on craft & construction \u00a0 At the 2025 Venice Architecture Biennale, Morocco\u2019s national pavilion addresses challenges posed by earthquakes across the region by taking an elemental approach to material, memory, and … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[142],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\ncelebrating material intelligence at venice architecture biennale<\/h2>\n
interview with Khalil Morad El Ghilali <\/strong>
\n<\/h2>\n